MysticTrees Theme - HTML 5 and mobile friendly

Ask questions about FlatPress themes, present your themes, request new themes.
Post Reply
laborix
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 3:51 pm

MysticTrees Theme - HTML 5 and mobile friendly

Post by laborix » Tue Mar 28, 2023 6:17 pm

The MysticTrees theme is actually a further development of the Simplewood theme. Anyway, it has never been published before.
preview.png
preview.png (87.57 KiB) Viewed 9924 times
It can be used with FlatPress 1.2.1, as well as with the FlatPress 1.3 dev Github 864 version. It is based on HTML 5, mobile friendly and tested with PC, tablets and mobile phones.

Can anyone add the MysticTrees theme to the FlatPress Wiki?
Attachments
mystictrees-en.zip
(164.27 KiB) Downloaded 516 times

User avatar
fraenkiman
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2022 7:25 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Re: MysticTrees Theme - HTML 5 and mobile friendly

Post by fraenkiman » Tue Mar 28, 2023 8:54 pm

Hello Laborix,

thank you very much for sharing the theme with all of us.
I have created a page in the wiki to go with it.

With best regards
Frank
:pencil: You are strong in PHP and Java Script? :point_right: Then help us to improve FlatPress. :point_left:

:exploding_head: Looking for ideas, templates, examples and answers to frequently asked questions?
:bulb: You'll find it here.

My :de: FlatPress-Blog: https://frank-web.dedyn.io

User avatar
Arvid
FlatPress Coder
Posts: 581
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2019 7:40 pm
Contact:

Re: MysticTrees Theme - HTML 5 and mobile friendly

Post by Arvid » Sun Apr 09, 2023 12:29 pm

Looks damn nice, responsive and all... I like! :D
(Thanks Frank for "wikiing" as well!)

Found a little typo, though: "skip to serach"

All the best
Arvid

laborix
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 3:51 pm

Re: MysticTrees Theme - HTML 5 and mobile friendly

Post by laborix » Tue Apr 11, 2023 4:48 pm

Arvid wrote: ↑Sun Apr 09, 2023 12:29 pm... Found a little typo, though: "skip to serach" ...
Hehe, I didn't notice that while testing, I must have looked somewhere but not at the spelling :lol:

Thanks for pointing that out


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests